Working in the WorldThe Workerless World
Therefore the Lord God sent him [Adam] forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken. Genesis. 3:23 And so Adam, driven from Eden for his lack of discrimination, is told what every father tells a grown son: get a job. Because of technology, not many Adams 'till the ground' any longer.(1) Nevertheless most, at least until recently, have been, 'gainfully employed.' But that may be ending as we enter into 'the workerless world.' First a quick bit of current history: fiber optic and satellite communications technology, linking worldwide computer networks, has created an embryonic global marketplace. To take advantage, businesses rush to grow bigger, doing more with fewer and fewer people. Hence, the rafts of mega-mergers, corporate downsizing, and fervor to automate. An alarming number of Adams as a result now find themselves walking the street. From Eden onward, if the truth be admitted, Adam has been hell-bent on devising ways he wouldn't have to work so hard. Or, work at all. Well, finally Adam may get his wishhe may find himself among the permanently unemployed. In his new book, The End of Work, Jeremy Rifkin sees the juggernaut of what he calls the "Third Industrial Revolution" (the first revolution began in 1815 with the automation of the English crofters; the second with the institution of assembly line production in the 1920s) introducing a level of automation that will ultimately create a virtually workerless world. In such a world, having a full-time job will be a mark of status. As in the feudal system of the Middle Ages there will be the nobility and the peasants (but, at least the peasants then could still 'till the ground'(2)). In the world to come, we are told, the top layer will be the industry chieftains and their top managers, a kind of priestly elite, supported by castes of symbolic analysts and technophiles to massage the information and maintain the machines. The three groups below, comprising the largest strata of society, will be 1) temporary employees, 2) the permanently unemployed, and 3) the unemployable. Writes Rifkin: Rifkin scoffs at the idea of retraining: If the problem of joblessness is not solved, Rifkin sees: "A new form of barbarism waits just outside the walls of the modern world. Beyond the quiet suburbs, exurbs, and urban enclaves of the rich and near-rich lie millions upon millions of destitute and desperate human beings." Rifkin's solution is to empower what he calls "the Third Sector," made up of charity and community-based organizations which will step in to provide the basic services of aid and assistance that government cutbacks preclude. Government will fund this sector (presumably by taxing the corporations, who increasingly are multi-nationals with headquarters in tax havens) and provide the necessary incentives in terms of tax deductions for volunteer time and what he terms "social wages" instead of welfare that is earned by work within communities. Rifkin concludes his study with the declaration: Though Rifkin's analysis is penetrating and his Third Sector solution provocative, the future he envisions depends on the continuance of globalization and automation. But we look more to the breakup of the global marketplace rather than its continuance. For a simple reason: massive jobless populations, their hopelessness and idleness a breeding ground for crime and terrorism, no nation can long endure. Therefore, as nations lose their industrial bases and jobs, they will resort to trade wars to protect them. Unable to sustain their economies for long in isolation, nations will combine into great superstate economies. (1) The number of farmer workers in the United States has fallen from 23 million in 1950 to less than five million in 1990. (2) An esoteric interpretation of having to "till the ground" may be the loosening and turning over of one's own 'ground'; that is, working with the lower centers and not the higher, as Gurdjieff stresses. (3) 1984, George Orwell, pgs. 153-57. Orwell, we think, rightly sees that an all-round increase in wealth would threaten what he calls "a hierarchical society." Certainly a secular one. (See Parabola, Volume IX, Number 1, for another view of hierarchy). He also makes the point that if inequality concerning wealth were ended, then "wealth would confer no distinction." According to Gurdjieff, inequality is necessary for evolution… "Everything in nature has its aim and its purpose, both the inequality of man and his suffering. To destroy inequality would mean destroying the possibility of evolution." Search, pp. 307-08. (4) Brave New World Revisited, Aldous Huxley, p. 89. Already whole lines of clothes made from hemp are being marketed by Calvin Klein and others. This will lead to more and more hemp farms and it will be hard to keep hemp "down on the farm." The coffee houses of today may be the cannabis sativa houses of tomorrow. Abstracting the masses from their bodies and the physical world, too, is the growing "Cyber Culture." Already computer games such as Ascendancy take 100 hours to play. Intellectually addictive, the more multi-layered the game, the more time the player must invest. The 'hermetic' quality of the experience leads to a kind of cyber-initiation and fraternity which gamemakers promote. |
For the remainder of this article, please order The Gurdjieff Journal Issue #9 |